I've made a few versions of this band in the past - one for Mistress Amata, one for Mistress Oksana, and one that I gave to Mistress Willoc. It was entered in Kingdom A&S in 2012.
The link to the PDF pattern is here:
PDF Pattern
Note: What is below is my documentation packet, pulled from MS Word. The photos I used didn't pull over (but the captions did) - and at this point, I'm not going to try and find those photos again to put in. If you would like to see the photos used, please let me know. Approximately 1/2 are from books (citation given) and 1/2 are my photos (labeled Author). I often use the same 'Technique of Tablet Weaving' section in multiple documentation packets, so you may also find the photos in other things I've written.
Laurel Wreath Hair Filet made from
Tablet-Woven Silk
Summary:
This is a hair filet to be worn as a Laurel Wreath. It is
made from silk, and features a repeating laurel pattern in 3/1 broken twill
tablet weaving.
Material: recycled spun 3-ply silk
Tools: leather tablets, Oseberg style loom, shuttle
Pattern: original design, based on historical examples
Technique of Tablet
Weaving
Figure 1: Technique
of Tablet Weaving (Collingwood 22)
Tablet weaving is a type of twined-warp weaving in which
tablets (also called cards) form the sheds with holes (usually 2 or 4) through
which the warp ends are threaded. If the tablets are rotated, either in groups
or singly, sheds are created for the passage of the weft. (Crowfoot et al. 213)
Different patterns (including
double-faced) can be created by how the tablets are threaded and which
direction they are turned. Simple patterns rely on moving blocks of tablets in
the same direction (4 forward, 4 backwards, for example) while in the most complex
weaving, each tablet is individually manipulated, as in 3/1 broken twill
patterning like this piece.
The Materials
Silk, wool, and linen were traditional materials used for
weaving in Medieval Europe. (Crowfoot et. al 15-19; 130) Silk was imported from
the East, and was considered a luxury item, while wool and linen were locally
produced. Materials were often combined in the same piece of weaving, often
with wool forming the ‘ground weave’, with silk brocaded over the top in
complex designs. All silk and all wool bands have also been found, as well as all
linen, and some that are missing elements of the weave, presumably plant fiber
(linen), which has disappeared. (Collingwood 17)
Historically, the silk used in tablet weaving was usually
plied and then doubled or tripled. (Crowfoot, et al. 130) Silk filament is
naturally off-white, and easily takes dyes, and very bright, vibrant colors are
possible. Red dyestuffs include kermes and madder, while green was produced by
overdyeing weld (yellow) with woad (blue). (Crowfoot et. al 19-20) Examples of embroidery on shoes indicate the 3
colors were used at the same time, as well. (Grew and de Neergaard 77)
Recycling silk from one piece of fabric to another is known
from ancient times, when silk and metal threads were so valuable that old items
were recycled into new items, either as whole pieces, or unwoven so it could be
re-made as something new. (Lardner 16, Spies 13-15) I used 3-ply silk from recycling sweaters
labeled “100% silk” from thrift stores. All of the silk is the original color
from the 3 individual sweaters, to ensure a constant dye-lot. See Appendix I
for details on recycling silk sweaters for weaving projects.
Tools
The Tablets
Figure 2: Leather
cards (Author)
Examples of tablets for weaving have been found in wood,
bone, antler, and leather. (Collingwood 25; Crowfoot et. al 24) It is possible
that metal was also used, although such tablets could wear through the warp
threads during weaving. Tablets need to be thin and fairly consistent in order
to create the best weaving. The historical tablets are in the 1-2” (25-40mm)
range, much smaller than most modern examples. (Crowfoot et. al 24) Small, thin
tablets are an advantage when working with a wide warp, in order to keep it all
in line.
I made the leather tablets used for weaving the filet. There
has been one example found in Bryggen in Bergen, Norway, (Øye 78) dated to the
medieval period, and the supposition is that other leather cards have just not
survived in the archaeological record. These cards were handmade, using 3-4 oz
leather (3/64-1/32” thick). Each tablet was individually cut using a cutting
die in a press for consistency. Uneven and inconsistent tablets seem to be more
common than our modern examples show, based on the examples from the Oseberg
ship burial.
Leather tablets have 2 distinct sides - the smooth ‘grain’
side, and the fuzzier ‘flesh’ side. I use leather with very smooth flesh sides,
because the fuzz can tangle in the threads while turning the tablets. Using
vegetable tanned leather for the tablets allows decoration, as well. Stamping,
carving, and painting are all medieval leather decoration techniques, and work
well to customize the cards.
The Loom
Historically, tablet weaving was done on backstrap looms and
the ‘Oseberg’ style band loom, based on manuscript illuminations. (Collingwood
17; Figures 3, 4, and 5) These looms all
help control the unwoven section of the warp, while keeping the tablets under
tension.
Figure 3: Backstrap method of tablet weaving (Collingwood 34)
The backstrap loom is the simplest and oldest. The warp is
connected to a stationary point (a hook on the wall, for example) and then the
fell (woven area) is attached to the weaver, usually at the belt. (Collingwood
31) This type of loom has been used for a variety of weaving techniques around
the world, although it leaves no ‘physical’ trace in the archaeological record.
Figure 4: Example of tablet weaving on an Oseberg style band loom (KB 76 F 21, fol. 14r, c.
1400-1410)
The Oseberg band loom is an improvement on the backstrap
method of weaving. The tablet weaving is attached to 2 fixed poles, and the
weaving occurs between them. Such weaving has even tension, and it can be left
in place between weaving sessions. Examples in various manuscripts show similar
looms, often with the Virgin Mary doing tablet weaving. It is so-named because
of the noblewoman’s grave with a loom warped for tablet weaving. (Collingwood
17)
The Shuttle
Figure 5: Example of tablet weaving on an Oseberg style
band loom (KB 128 D 30, fol. 37r, c.
1460)
I use simple wooden shuttles with a ‘knife edge’ for both
passing the weft and beating the weaving tight. As can be seen in Figures 3 and
4, a ‘sword beater’ is often shown, which is a wood or metal piece, shaped like
a small sword, with a blunt edge to beat down the weft. (see Figures 3 and 4) Using
a separate beater can have some advantages, although using a knife edged
shuttle means one less piece to carry around.
Creating the Pattern
This pattern is the first original design I developed after
learning how to draft and create patterns in 3/1 twill. This pattern is
designed to be continuous (See figure 10 below). While many 3/1 twill motifs
are separate (small sections combined to form the ribbon) – the Hallstatt
examples (c. 400BCE Austria) were done as repeating patterns, specifically for
trimming the edge of garments. (Bichler, et al. 81-90)
The pattern was developed using Excel for easy manipulation
(see color draft and weaving drafts pages 8-9 below). The pattern uses 21
tablets, with 2 solid colored selvedge on each side and 17 pattern tablets.
Each pick of the weave involves turning each tablet in a specific way, forward
or backwards. The pattern repeats over 32 picks.
Starting with a blank Excel grid, the laurel pattern was put
in first, using the ‘rules’ and examples from Mistress Phiala’s article in
TWIST (Goslee 8-9). Then the background
was filled in to create the twill patterning. Because the pattern repeats, it
was necessary to double check the ‘join’ between rows 32 and 1 to be sure the
twill continued correctly. Part of
designing in 3/1 broken twill is deciding where the ‘floats’ (sections of
abnormal weave, where the card will ‘idle’ in order to be in the correct
position for the consecutive pick) will appear. All of the floats are just
before a pattern change, following historical examples.
Figure 6: Detail from the stole from
the Church of St.
Donat, Arlon,
Belgium
(Collingwood Plate 173)
The pattern for the laurel vine is inspired by a small motif
from the stole kept at the church
of St. Donat, said to
belong to St. Bernard, who died in 1153. (Collingwood 208; 212-213, plate 173)
The stole was woven in 3/1 broken twill, using different colored silks for the
motifs and background. 3/1 broken twill was the more common weave set-up for
tablet weaving designs in Europe, based on the
surviving examples, which date from as early as 400BCE. (Collingwood 208,
Bichler, et. al 81-90) Many pieces show similar design elements – a striped
background, with the pattern usually in the lighter color. The weaving
technique allows for very clean diagonal lines, but not horizontal or vertical
color breaks. This lends itself to ‘vining’ motifs, like the Laurel pattern.
I chose to reverse the color choice from the historical
examples, in order to make the leaves green. I chose red and white for the
background based on the color preferences of the recipient and for good
contrast.
Warping and Weaving
the Piece
Figure 7: Warped tablets. (Author)
The tablets were warped using the ‘continuous warp’ method.
The cards in the center (warped green and red) were done first, and then the
outer cards (white and green). The selvedge was done last (all red) and then
all the cards were moved into the correct position, based on the pattern (page 8
below).
Figure 8: The warped loom. (Author)
The pattern was woven using the ‘plain’ pattern (page 9
below), with just the ‘+’ and ‘-‘. The color pattern (page 8) was used only
when a mistake in the weaving was found, in order to correct for the next pick.
Figure 9: The progression of weaving. (Author)
To help control tension and keep it even, the angle of the
warp (see Figures 8
and 9) was shifted as needed. Because the selvedge always turns forward, twist
build up increases dramatically, compared to the rest of the weaving. Therefore
the selvedge cards were ‘flipped’ on their axes (from S to Z and vice versa)
after every pattern repeat. This helped ‘untwist’ the build up. As the weaving progressed (Figure 9)
the unwoven end was untied and all of the twists were worked out before being
retied.
Figure 10: Close up of weaving.. (Author)
3/1 broken twill is one of the most complex tablet weaving
methods because of the ‘offset’ nature of the cards. Each card moves in the
traditional ‘Forward-Forward-Back-Back’ system – but it will never be in the
same position as the ones on either side.
If a card gets turned incorrectly, it can be difficult to ‘see’ that it
isn’t right, unlike in double-face double-weave, where all of the cards are in
sync. It is also easy to create extra-long ‘floats’, where the threads aren’t
twining correctly. Mistakes are also hard to correct, because 3/1 twill is
harder to ‘unweave’ than double-face double weave.
Hair Filets
Figure 11: Extant example of a hair filet
attached to false hair. (Crowfoot et al. 132)
Hair filets were commonly in many parts of Europe
by women of various ranks in the 14th and 15th centuries, based on manuscript pictures
and historical examples. (Crowfoot et al. 132, Figure 9)
Tablet weaving was used to create
decorative filets, with either woven-in patterns (like this one) or using gold
wire brocaded over the ground weave. Brocading
was the later technique, and was often used in conjunction with 3/1 twill
patterning on the most ornate pieces. (Collingwood 208)
Works Consulted
Bichler, Peter,
et al. Hallstatt Textiles: Technical
Analysis, Scientific Investigation and Experiment on Iron Age Textiles. Oxford: Archaeopress,
2005.
Collingwood,
Peter. The Techniques of Tablet Weaving.
New York:
Watson-Guptill Publications, 1982. New Edition: McMinnville, Oregon: Robin and Russ Handweavers, 2002.
Crowfoot, Elisabeth, Frances
Pritchard and Kay Staniland. Textiles and
Clothing c.1150 -- c.1450 (Medieval Finds from Excavations in London:
4). London:
Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1992. New addition - Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2001, 2002.
Goslee, Sarah
(SKA Mistress Phiala O'Ceallaigh).
"Understanding Tablet Weaving part 3: Patterned Bands." TWIST -
Tablet Weavers' International Studies and Techniques. Summer 2009: 8-9.
Grew, Francis and
Margrethe de Neergaard. Shoes and Pattens (Medieval Finds from Excavations
in London: 2). London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office,
1988. New addition – Woodbridge:
The Boydell Press, 2001.
Hald, Margrethe. Ancient Danish textiles from bogs and
burials: a comparative study of costume and Iron Age textiles. Denmark: National
Museum of Denmark, 1980.
Lardner,
Dionysius. A Treatise on the Origin, Progressive Improvement, and Present State of the Silk Manufacture. Philadelphia: Carey &
Lea, 1832.
Koninklijke
Bibliotheek. Mary weaving in the Temple. 1410. Illuminated Book of
Hours. Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The
Hague, Netherlands.
Web. 18 Jan 2012.
<http://resources42.kb.nl/MIMI/MIMI_76F21/MIMI_76F21_014R.JPG>.
-- Annunciation. 1460. Festal Missal.
Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague,
Netherlands.
Web. 18 Jan 2012. <http://resources42.kb.nl/MIMI/MIMI_128D30/MIMI_128D30_037R_MARGE.JPG>.
Øye, Ingvild. Textile Equipments and Its Working
Environment. Oslo, Norway: Universitetforlaget
AS (Norwegian
University Press), 1988.
Spies, Nancy. Ecclesiastical Pomp & Aristocratic
Circumstance. Jarretsville: Arelate Studio, 2000.
|
Band in red white, and green. |
|
Band in gold, white, and red. |